There are 13 Replies:
|
|
Message
|
Person and Time
|
|
his role may have been as big as kreacher's, but it wasn't as important. role size doesn't matter when it comes to role importance. when it comes to paring down the book to fit into a movie that won't make my fractured tailbone protest from having sat in the theater seat so long, what's important is given first priority. |
|
fairy queen
|
Mar 1, 2008
(75 days and 14 hours ago)
|
|
|
Rowling can only demand so much, and anyway it is impossible to take a book as huge as OoTP and put it in a three hour movie. If they had doubled the movie length, they would have had to cut out far less. But who watches a six hour movie? |
|
Famov
|
Mar 3, 2008
(73 days and 22 hours ago)
|
|
|
not me. owies! |
|
fairy queen
|
Mar 3, 2008
(73 days and 15 hours ago)
|
|
|
OK, but remember we only see Kreacher in two scenes and he doesn't get a lot of screentime. All he does is complain about "Mudbloods and blood traitors", talk to the portrait of Mrs. Black, and get yelled at by Sirius. That's it. Mundungus could've appeared for Mrs. Figg to yell at him once. They could've only done that. Heck, they put Elphias Doge, Emmeline Vance, and Dawlish into the movie and they're slightly more minor characters than Mundungus |
|
Riddler014029
|
Mar 4, 2008
(72 days and 17 hours ago)
|
|
|
i'm not ging to repeat myself about role *importance* if you're not going to listen again. |
|
fairy queen
|
Mar 4, 2008
(72 days and 14 hours ago)
|
|
|
Mundungs was important or at least more important then Elphias Doge, Emmeline Vance, and Dawlish |
|
savage613
|
Mar 10, 2008
(66 days and 23 hours ago)
|
|
|
i've never heard of them, so they must not be important. at least not important enough for inclusion into the screenplay. and let me get one thing straight. nobody on this site is writing the harry potter screenplays, so stop pretending like you are. the guy who actually is writing them is not only not on this site, he will not listen to wannabes from this site, so get over it. |
|
fairy queen
|
Mar 11, 2008
(65 days and 16 hours ago)
|
|
|
Nobody said whoever writes screenplay was at this forum were simply saying that leaving mundungs out was just another error in the HP movie series which has only produced one movie that even came close to living up to the book |
|
savage613
|
Mar 12, 2008
(64 days and 18 hours ago)
|
|
|
But Riddler is acting like s/he's giving Rowling advice on her own stuff like Rowling visits this page or something. Rowling has her own reasons for not including things, and we have absolutely no say in the matter, so we might as well not say it. |
|
fairy queen
|
Mar 12, 2008
(64 days and 15 hours ago)
|
|
|
And since when has any movie EVER lived up to the book? |
|
fairy queen
|
Mar 12, 2008
(64 days and 15 hours ago)
|
|
|
Well, it's too late to put Mundungus in Order of the Phoenix, isn't it? I'm just wondering how the directors of Deathly Hallows are going to have Umbridge come into possession of the locket. Unless they cut the whole Umbridge scene It's "he" by the way, just so u know |
|
Riddler014029
|
Mar 12, 2008
(64 days and 15 hours ago)
|
|
|
OK then since nobody of any importance well ever read any post in all of Gt why bother posting??? |
|
savage613
|
Mar 13, 2008
(63 days and 18 hours ago)
|
|
|
that's precisely what i'd like to know, savage. |
|
fairy queen
|
Mar 13, 2008
(63 days and 16 hours ago)
|
|