There are 6 Replies:
|
|
Message
|
Person and Time
|
|
They were all bad besides GoF and the first one Though you are right this one was the worst or maybe it was PoA they were both horrible |
|
savage613
|
Mar 24, 2008
(53 days and 3 hours ago)
|
|
|
i've been disappointed with all of the movies, but so far, i agree order of the phoenix is the worse |
|
hawkfrost
|
Mar 24, 2008
(53 days and 0 hours ago)
|
|
|
OotP film certainly felt rushed, but it was still certainly enjoyable. The acting had also significantly improved on Daniel Radcliffe, which made it easier to watch. Personally, it's too difficult for me to pick a best/worst out of the Harry Potter films. They each have their ups and downs. |
|
merlins beard!
|
Mar 24, 2008
(52 days and 18 hours ago)
|
|
|
I think GoF and OotF was really rushed. PoA was just weird and wasn't good at explaining things well. People who never read the books got confused on that movie. But I think the first 2 movies were great. I think the director will get lots of freedom with HBP since there isn't that much going on. Which hopefully is a good thing. |
|
Crazy Shaman
|
Mar 25, 2008
(52 days and 2 hours ago)
|
|
|
To be brutally honest, all of the movies are rubbish. I prefer the books over the movies. I think the only thing the movies are good for is helping you to see what certain places described in the books actually look like i.e, Ministry of Magic, Hogwarts and Number 12 Grimmauld Place. Though admitedly, the way they appeared in the movies was nothing like a imagined them, so maybe they're not helpful at all ¬_¬ |
|
Jaden Alkarin
|
Mar 26, 2008
(50 days and 23 hours ago)
|
|
|
I thought the first two movies were good, PoA was okay, there was something about it that i didn't like. The most recent two I thought were terrible, they were definetly rushed and my friend that saw them with me had no idea what was going on (obviously, shes never read the books) |
|
bondsgirl007
|
Mar 29, 2008
(47 days and 19 hours ago)
|
|