I can quite easily answer all these.

1. Majora's Mask is just SHORT. Deal with it. It did also include sidequests to extend the amount of gameplay on it.

2. Termina isn't as big as Hyrule. And does it really have to have 100 Skulltulas like Oot did? What's wrong with having a different number?

3. Does every Zelda game have to have Zelda in it?

4. Majora's Mask's time feature was an interesting addition. It may have limited you to a certain amount of time playing the game, but what's wrong with something new?

And also, why does Majora's Mask have to be identical to Oot? Who really CARES? That's the way it was made, and will always be. Nothing will change that. Get over it.

"Firstly there are only 4 dungeons in this game whereas in Ocarina Of Time there are about 12.

In OoT, there were eight. Nine if you count Ganon's Tower.

In Majora's Mask, there were four main dungeons, but there were other areas that were technically dungeons but weren't main dungeons. Like, Ikana Castle, the well, Pirate's Fortress, etc.

Princess Zelda isnt even in this game so why is this game titled the legend of zelda?

Same reason why The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening is called the Legend of Zelda. Technically Zelda is in the game but that's being a bit too technical as she's only in one cutscene.

There area only 60 gold skultulas in this game whereas in Ocarina Of Time there are 100. "

In Majora's Mask, the Skultulas were one sidequest in the game (as they were in Ocarina of Time). But Majora's Mask had several other sidequests in the game, while the Skultulas and a trading quest were the only sidequests in Ocarina of Time.

And you only get 3 days in this game whereas in ocarina of time u get endless days.

Three days too hard for you or something :P? I thought that was a fancy addition :3.

I can see your point of the game being named Zelda when Princess Zelda is not even in the game, but I guess they use that name because Zelda is the famous Trademark name. I personally like OOT better, but Majora's mask is not a bad game. They each have their own themes. OOT had 9 temples not 12, 3 Link must complete as child link and 6 as adult link. That makes a total of nine.

As for the "three days" thing does it really matter when you can play the song of time and go back to the original day. The three day thing is just part of the game.

I'd personally agree with James. Majora's Mask is not as Epic as OOT.

The reason this is called a "Legend of Zelda" game is because it is the sequel to a previous :Legend Of Zelda" game. Basically its the same story as OOT but it takes place after the end of OOT. So instead of having the second part of the previous game and calling it something else like "Legend of Majora's Mask" They just continued using the same name. "Link's Awakening" is another story though. Same with the "Oracle" games.

personaly i dont see the point making so much about this game i think it is good how it is, plus if they made it like OOT it would not be as good cos it would basicly be the same

If they made MM the same as OoT, it would just be boring. Yes, there is only 4 dungeons, but alongside theres multiple sidequests that you can do if you want. Also the three day time limit was a good challenge in my opinion, and if you don't like it, dont play the game! I thought the time travel was amazing, with all th boos replay that comes along with it.